Publication information |
Source: Chicago Daily Tribune Source type: newspaper Document type: article Document title: “Raise Point of Disability” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: Chicago, Illinois Date of publication: 10 September 1901 Volume number: 60 Issue number: 253 Part/Section: 1 Pagination: 2 |
Citation |
“Raise Point of Disability.” Chicago Daily Tribune 10 Sept. 1901 v60n253: part 1, p. 2. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (incapacity); presidents (incapacity); James A. Garfield (incapacity); presidential assassinations (comparison). |
Named persons |
Andrew H. Allen; Chester A. Arthur; James A. Garfield; Charles J. Guiteau; Thomas Hendricks; William McKinley. |
Document |
Raise Point of Disability
Washington Authorities Unable to Find Who Is to Judge as to President’s Incapacitation.
Washington, D. C., Sept. 9.—[Special.]—In the
event President McKinley will be unable to perform his official duties for a
long time to come, the serious question may be presented of who is to determine
whether he is incapacitated. Inquiries made at the government departments today
developed that the matter had never been settled officially.
The constitution provides that the Vice President
shall act in the event of the President’s inability, but does not say how that
fact is to be determined or who shall determine it. The only opportunity for
a determination was afforded during the illness of President Garfield, from
July 2, 1881, the day on which he was shot by Guiteau, until Sept. 19, when
he died.
Procedure in Garfield Case.
Andrew H. Allen, chief of the bureau
of rolls and library of the State department, in whose custody are the official
copies of most of the documents requiring the signature of the President, had
occasion while Garfield was dying and subsequently to investigate this matter,
and he was unable to find that the duties of any President of the United States
had ever been delegated to the Vice President or any other person.
There is not an official document in the files
of the State department for the period between July 2, 1881, and Sept. 19, 1881,
bearing the signature of President Garfield. During that time General Garfield
signed his name but twice, so far as can be ascertained here, once to some documents
relating to an international case in which it was decided that the President
himself must act. The second signature was affixed to an autograph letter to
his aged mother.
New Law Does Not Decide.
The succession law passed by Congress
after the death of Vice President Hendricks does not dispose of the question
of how it shall be determined, or by whom, whether a President of the United
States is unable to perform the duties of his official position.
The matter was discussed at great length by the
members of President Garfield’s Cabinet, and it was agreed by them that, if
they should determine that President Garfield was disabled within the meaning
of the constitution, they would collectively announce that fact to the country
and call upon Vice President Arthur to perform the duties of the President.
During the lifetime of President Garfield, and
notwithstanding the fact that he was critically ill for nearly ninety days,
the Cabinet did not determine that he was incapacitated, and, therefore, did
not call upon Vice President Arthur to act. It was not until President Garfield
was dead that Vice President Arthur assumed the Presidency and took the oath
of office. As already indicated, President Garfield did not sign any official
business during the entire time of his illness, as each member of the Cabinet
performed the duties relating to their respective departments, acting without
orders from the stricken President.
Powers of Cabinet Officers.
It has been decided by the Supreme
Court that a Cabinet officer has the right to execute the laws relating to his
department without conferring with the President regarding every detail. In
signing official papers and in giving orders they do not use the expression
“By direction of the President,” but issue instructions in their own right.
The Supreme Court held that the Cabinet officers had authority to do this.
It is true the Secretary of War, who issues more
orders than all the other Cabinet officers combined, does frequently use the
expression, “By order of the President,” but under the ruling of the Supreme
Court this is not essential to make his acts lawful.
When President Garfield’s Cabinet decided upon
the course to pursue, if they decided the President was disabled, Vice President
Arthur agreed with their decision and did not attempt to exercise any of the
duties which are by the constitution imposed upon the President. There is no
official record of the action of President Garfield’s Cabinet, and in the unfortunate
event of the disability of President McKinley it is quite likely his Cabinet
may be governed by the plan mapped out by President Garfield’s official household,
but of course they will have to determine the matter when the exigency arises.