| Publication information | 
| Source: San Francisco Call Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “Hearst and American People” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: San Francisco, California Date of publication: 1 October 1901 Volume number: 90 Issue number: 123 Pagination: 6 | 
| Citation | 
| “Hearst and American People.” San Francisco Call 1 Oct. 1901 v90n123: p. 6. | 
| Transcription | 
| full text | 
| Keywords | 
| Hearst newspapers; William Randolph Hearst. | 
| Named persons | 
| William Randolph Hearst; Judas; William McKinley; Patrick W. Riordan; George Francis Whittemore. | 
| Document | 
  Hearst and American People
 HEARST’S celebrated defense, appearing simultaneously in his 
  three newspapers, differing only in the personalities it indulges and grandiloquently 
  addressed “to the American people,” has been on the market long enough to enable 
  judgment of its effect.
       After it appeared in New York, the American people 
  stopped their subscriptions and refused to receive his paper from the carriers 
  when it was offered free. They excluded it from their houses and places of business. 
  Then Hearst had his paper wrapped like a parcel of merchandise and delivered 
  by special messengers. This plan failed. One of the American people in New York 
  investigated the subject, and in a public communication said: “They have prepared 
  thousands of copies done up in this manner to leave at every house, store and 
  office. Nearly every American District Telegraph messenger office in the city 
  has one or more thousands so prepared, with orders to distribute. This looks 
  as if the yellow was on its last legs.”
       Ladies sent to other papers like letters to warn 
  mothers against this sinister plan to sneak Hearst’s paper into families of 
  the American people. Clubs, composed of the American people, excluded it from 
  their rooms and entered an order suspending for a month any member who brought 
  it within their rooms or read it there. In the street cars ladies refused to 
  occupy seats alongside of men who were reading Hearst’s papers, giving their 
  reasons to be heard by all the passengers. In some cases the readers threw the 
  sheet out of the window and apologized. In all cases they threw it, and were 
  cheered by the crowd of passengers.
       In his proclamation to the American people Hearst 
  asked the question, who hate the Examiner, in Chicago the American, and in New 
  York the Journal, and answered it: “Those whom it has fought, and those who 
  have been hurt in the newspaper business by a success which is at once a rebuke 
  to incapacity and in infuriating provocation to envy and jealousy.”
       Judged by their denunciations of Hearst and his 
  papers, he has “fought” a majority of the clergy of the United States and the 
  presidents of colleges and universities. He has fought Archbishop Riordan of 
  this city, bishops and clergy of the Episcopal and Methodist churches, the pastors 
  of all the churches governed by the presbytery, and all the churches that have 
  congregational government, for they have joined in expressing the hatred that 
  good men feel for him and his style of journalism. Then he has fought the G. 
  A. R., for its sentiments were expressed in a national memorial which said of 
  him “he is a Judas with the addition of disguise and modern enterprise. His 
  seeds of murder, hate and anarchy, fructify into crimes like the assassination 
  of President McKinley.” He has fought the thousands of club organizations and 
  commercial bodies which have outlawed his papers and the hundreds of thousands 
  of men and women who join the Rev. George Francis Whittemore in saying: “Who 
  for gain tempts men to crime, let his name be anathema.”
       In his proclamation “to the American people” Hearst 
  announces that in the future, as in the past, his papers will “be human and 
  animated and entertaining” indulging “the light word and funny picture”; and 
  protests that is all he has done, and all that makes people stop his paper, 
  outlaw and exclude it, refuse information to his unfortunate reporters, and 
  even order from their doorsteps district messenger boys who try to deliver it 
  wrapped up like linen from the laundry.
       He is right. His idea of being human and entertaining, 
  and the light and funny picture, is in issue. It was to be human and entertaining 
  that he used these light words: “McKinley’s is a dull brain. It is a milk and 
  water brain.”—“McKinley and his Wall-street Cabinet are ready to surrender every 
  particle of national honor and dignity.”—“The people must decide between conservative 
  remedies now, and desperate remedies later.”—“The world’s achievements and great 
  changes have all come from discontent, and you should be, in as many ways as 
  possible, a breeder of discontent among the human beings around you.”—“The time 
  of dissolution is at hand. Twenty corporations own the President and virtually 
  exercise the functions of government.”—“So what we hear that this republic is 
  in danger now, just remember what a short time intervened between the King (of 
  France), alive and drinking, and the King dead, and the peasants all eating.”—“McKinley 
  plays the coward and shivers white-faced. He makes an international cur of his 
  country; he is an abject, weak, futile, incompetent poltroon. He is, therefore, 
  the most despised and hated creature in the hemisphere.”
       These “light words,” and “human and entertaining” 
  sentiments, were illustrated by Mr. Hearst’s idea of funny pictures, representing 
  the President idiotically applauding the starving and murder of the common people, 
  or as a negro minstrel, singing coon songs. Really, Mr. Hearst is too human 
  and entertaining in his way and too funny after his idea for the American people. 
  They believe him to be a blackguard, an envenomed pervert and degenerate, and 
  his papers unfit to enter a decent family, club or place of business. That seems 
  to be the only difference at present existing between Hearst and the American 
  people.