The Lesson for Canada
Canadians may be tempted
at this time to indulge in reflections of their own immunity from
such crimes as that committed on Friday at Buffalo. We may indeed
have cause to be thankful that the doctrine of the anarchist has
not as yet been proclaimed in this land, and that in this country
the sanctity of human life has been maintained by law and public
opinion. It is not known that the Dominion harbors even one professed
anarchist who would commend the murder of men in authority. If there
are such persons in this country, and if they should use such language
in regard to the Buffalo crime as was openly used in Paterson after
King Humbert was killed, they would be arrested and their career
as encouragers of crime would come to an end. But while we hope
that Canada is free from these dangerous classes, it is well not
to be boastful. The road is open and no country can know when its
turn may come. At least, however, we can resolve that the promoters
and open advocates of these crimes in other lands shall have no
part or lot with us.
It is not many years since attempts
to murder Old World rulers were attributed in the United States
to the natural unrest of the downtrodden masses. American freedom
was prescribed as the antidote for all these evils. For many years
the American Republic has been the refuge of criminals guilty of
the class of murders which the perpetrators called political offences.
Even yet an advocate of murder in Ireland is frequently applauded
in public in Chicago and other cities. There are organizations in
the United States, which disfellowship their fellow members in this
country, because the Canadian Irish societies do not condone acts
of lawlessness and crimes of violence. Aiders of the Invincibles[;]
comrades and well wishers of the murderer of Czar Alexander; associates
and applauders of the man who slew King Humbert, have been too long
tolerated in the United States. They have been considered good enough
to find employment with respectable workmen in factories and other
industries.
Nor is this the first time when these
evil disposed people have turned their hand against the country
which too generously gave them protection. In 1886 a band of Chicago
anarchists took advantage of certain labor troubles. When the police
undertook to disperse a meeting to which one Fielden was making
an incendiary speech a bomb was thrown among the police and the
anarchists afterwards fired on the force, of whom seven were killed
or died of their wounds, while over fifty more were injured. Seven
leaders of the society which planned this act were convicted. Four
were hanged and one committed suicide. The sentences of the other
two were commuted, and Governor Altgeld kindly pardoned them at
a time of political stress. Since then great tolerance has been
shown toward the advocates of assassination, and now they have been
heard from again in their adopted country.
The experience of the United States
should teach us Canadians not to be self-righteous, or to boast
of our freedom from these “political offences.” Rather let it be
understood that this country shall not be made a rendezvous or hiding
place for men who are bad citizens of other lands. There is no security
in the belief we have that this is a free country, where every man
has his fair chance to live. This counts for nothing with the enemies
of all governments and the sworn foes of law and order. Let us be
modest in our claim of superiority but resolute in our determination
that Canada shall not be a dumping ground for a class of actual
or prospective criminals from any country. As one of the city clergymen
said yesterday, it is better to have a small increase of population
than to welcome such immigrants as these.
Let us hope also that in this country
no such words shall be heard as those reported to have been spoken
in a conspicuous pulpit in the United States yesterday. The lawlessness
shown in the horrible lynchings, so frequently reported from the
south, is of another type from that of the Buffalo criminal. But
it is equally a defiance of law and order, in some cases equally
a crime against humanity, and nearly always more cruel and barbarous
as well as more cowardly than the assault on the president. To burn
an unconvicted and untried negro at the stake is murder and anarchy,
and the slaughter on the spot of the wretched assassin at Buffalo
would have been an act of anarchy if not murder. When men who stood
around and saw the foul deed were able out of respect for law to
restrain themselves from committing any serious act of violence,
a minister of the gospel with two days to think it over might well
have refrained from giving encouragement to lawlessness anywhere.
|