Publication information |
Source: St. Louis Republic Source type: newspaper Document type: article Document title: “Revised National Picture of President McKinley” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: St. Louis, Missouri Date of publication: 12 July 1903 Volume number: 96 Issue number: 12 Part/Section: magazine section Pagination: [5] |
Citation |
“Revised National Picture of President McKinley.” St. Louis Republic 12 July 1903 v96n12: mag. sect., p. [5]. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (paintings); McKinley memorialization; Harriet Anderson Stubbs Murphy; Harriet Anderson Stubbs Murphy (public statements). |
Named persons |
William R. Day; Marcus Hanna; William McKinley; Harriet Anderson Stubbs Murphy; John Tyler. |
Notes
|
The identity of Professor Lawrence (below) cannot be determined. Fairman’s
Art and Artists of the Capitol of the United States of America
(1927) identifies Murphy as being “a pupil of Lorenz and William Morgan.”
Possibly then Lawrence is an erroneous reference to Richard Lorenz.
It cannot be determined which President Harrison is being referred
to below.
The article is accompanied on the same page with two photographs, captioned as follows (respectively): “Murphy Portrait of the Late President as It Was Originally;” “As It Is Since Slight Alterations Were Made.” |
Document |
Revised National Picture of President McKinley
Woman Artist Painted Portrait That Is to Hang in the White House.
WRITTEN FOR THE SUNDAY REPUBLIC.
The official portrait of President McKinley, recently
hung in the White House, is the work of an American woman.
Among the portraits of all the Presidents thus
displayed, it is the first to have been executed by a woman, nor is it by any
means the least interesting or meritorious.
The appropriation of $2,500 by Congress for a
portrait of the late President naturally excited unusual interest among artists.
Many well-known artistic names were numbered among
the contestants.
The portrait finally chosen among many, after
careful artistic consideration, is by Mrs. W. D. Murphy of New York City.
In her art education and experience, and in her
sympathies, in everything, in short, but her birth, she is an American.
She was born in England, coming to America when
a mere child.
Her home was at first in Canada, whence she was
sent to New York to further her artistic education. Her talent was evident very
early, attracting considerable attention.
Mrs. Murphy cannot remember, she says, when she
began to draw. As a child she was always drawing, so that her talent seems to
antedate her earliest recollection.
SELF-TAUGHT ARTIST.
Her artistic training and experience
were had in the East.
In addition to attending the schools she had the
advantage of private instructors, among them Professor Lawrence of Munich.
She has never returned to Europe since her leaving
England. The art galleries and exhibitions in New York, she says, have been
her chief source of instruction and inspiration.
She attends them all regularly, sitting for hours
before the canvases to study their secrets.
It is, of course, particularly remarkable that
thus handicapped Mrs. Murphy’s portrait of President McKinley should have been
chosen from among the contributions of many of wider opportunity.
The present portrait was painted from photographs.
Not only had Mrs. Murphy no sitting, but she had never seen President McKinley.
The accepted portrait is life size and represents
the late President holding his glasses in his left hand and a sheet of paper
in the right, a characteristic attitude of Mr. McKinley when talking.
His closest friends, Senator Hanna and Judge Day,
passed upon the portrait and declared it to be an excellent likeness, the best
they had seen of him, a characteristic and spirited portraiture of the man,
expressing the full power, benevolence and impressiveness of President McKinley’s
remarkable countenance.
OFFICIAL PRAISE.
On several occasions the portrait
has been a model for sculptors desiring to execute statues of McKinley.
The portrait has just been hung in the Colonial
Hall of the White House at the side of the large mirrors, in one of the places
formerly occupied by the portraits of President Harrison and President Tyler.
When the painting was completed it was taken from
Mrs. Murphy’s studio and placed in the Corcoran Art Gallery, in Washington,
where it attracted a great deal of attention.
“By whom was it painted?” was constantly being
asked. The interest manifested in it showed more than anything else the public
appreciation of the work.
When $2,500 was appropriated by Congress for the
purchase of a portrait of the late President, Mrs. Murphy submitted her work.
The judges were confronted with work from the
brushes of men whose reputation in the world of art is unimpeachable.
The judges were selected as the most competent
men in the country to judge of the merits of the portrait.
The competitors were somewhat taken aback when
the announcement was made that the work of a woman had won, in spite of the
ancient tradition that a woman must always stay in the background of art when
in competition with men.
When they saw the accepted portrait their doubts
were silenced and they expressed the utmost satisfaction in the selection.
MRS. MURPHY’S GRATITUDE.
“I appreciate the honor of contributing
to so famous a collection,” said Mrs. Murphy in speaking of her success. “That
my portrait of President McKinley should have been chosen means, of course,
that not alone the art critics, but the intimate friends of the late President,
were pleased with my effort.
“This means much to me. I like to think that I
have caught the character of the man, the subtle something which finds expression
in the bearing and expression of my model.
“The word model is perhaps misleading. I never
saw President McKinley in my life.
“In painting his portrait, therefore, I was obliged
to work solely from photographs, aided by the impression I had gathered of his
personality.
“They tell me that I have been happy in catching
this latter, and I can only say I am very glad.
“The portrait as it now hangs in the halls of
the White House differs in no essential from the original sketch submitted by
me in the competition.
“The face and figure, in fact, remain exactly
as I first conceived them and placed them upon the canvas. The only alterations
I may call trifling, although I cheerfully substituted them.
“When Senator Hanna and Justice Day saw the McKinley
portrait the first suggestion made was that the flag which formed part of the
background on the painting be removed and a plain dark tone substituted.
“The reasons for the change were very characteristic.
It was Senator Hanna who explained: ‘President McKinley, you know, had no patent
on the American flag.’ Among all the portraits of the Presidents in the White
House I found that the flag had been omitted.
“A scroll of paper was also placed in one hand,
at the Senator’s suggestion. The only other alteration was to slightly reduce
the waist line [sic]. The President’s friends who examined the portrait agreed
that the figure as I had drawn it was true to life.
“The face and general expression as I had reproduced
it have been much praised by several of President McKinley’s closest friends.”