Publication information |
Source: Sun Source type: newspaper Document type: letter to the editor Document title: “Secret Service Agents” Author(s): G. City of publication: New York, New York Date of publication: 23 September 1901 Volume number: 69 Issue number: 23 Pagination: 6 |
Citation |
G. “Secret Service Agents.” Sun [New York] 23 Sept. 1901 v69n23: p. 6. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
The Sun [New York, NY]; Secret Service (criticism); Leslie’s Weekly; McKinley assassination (news coverage: photographs); McKinley assassination (news coverage: criticism); Samuel R. Ireland (photographs). |
Named persons |
G.; Samuel R. Ireland; William McKinley; John Wisser. |
Document |
Secret Service Agents
Comments on Their Failure to Protect Mr. McKinley at Buffalo.
T
T S
is right when it asserts that the Secret Service is in great and quick need
of a thorough overhauling. I want to call your attention to the pictures in
last week’s Leslie’s of the Secret Service agents close to the President
on that awful day. They are posing in a group beside the President! A Secret
Service agent of the United States Government posing for his portrait in a periodical!
What a farce! This group is labelled [sic] “The three men behind the stand are
the private detective and Secret Service men who seized the assassin.” All the
testimony as sent to Washington in an official report declares that the assassin
was seized and arrested by Capt. John P. Wisser’s men who helped arrest the
assassin. He is one of the artillery corps.
There is another picture in Leslie’s. It
is of Ireland, one of the Secret Service men close to the President at the time
he was murdered. This has the legend “Secret Service Agent S. R. Ireland, of
[sic] the most famous detectives in the service.” Famous detectives were all
the three who stood beside Mr. McKinley and permitted an agitated stranger with
a hand muffled in a handkerchief to shoot down our President! Yes, they are
famous in picture papers; very famous indeed. Do you know I was at Buffalo and
one of these famous detectives (in the picture papers) whined to the newspaper
men and said he hoped nothing more would be said as “he didn’t want to lose
his job?”
These Secret Service agents were appointed to
protect the life of the President on just such occasions. They did not do so.
They were criminally negligent from every standpoint. I wouldn’t be in their
shoes to-night for the wealth of the Indies.
Some of your correspondents in their letters to
T S have called them
“dubs;” that’s what they are, “dubs” and “posers” for picture papers. If a Secret
Service agent of any foreign government had his picture printed for public inspection
he would be summarily dismissed from the service.
But oh! the pity of it—President McKinley to have
been in such careless hands! Wherever I go in clubs, hotels and all public resorts
these Secret Service men who didn’t use ordinary care in protecting the President
from the assassin are not only roundly denounced but heartily despised.
G.
N
Y , Sept. 20.