Publication information |
Source: Lucifer, the Light-Bearer Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: none Author(s): Harman, Lillian Date of publication: 14 November 1901 Volume number: 5 Issue number: 44 Series: third series Pagination: 353 |
Citation |
Harman, Lillian. [untitled]. Lucifer, the Light-Bearer 14 Nov. 1901 v5n44 (3rd series): p. 353. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); Emma Goldman; John Hay (poetry); John Hay; the press (criticism). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; Emma Goldman; John Hay; William McKinley. |
Notes |
The editorial (below) is preceded on the same page by Secretary of State John Hay’s “Liberty,” which was originally published in 1875. The poem is given here as presented in the magazine:
The date of publication provided by the magazine is November 14, E.
M. 301.
Whole No. 891.
Alternate magazine title: Lucifer, the Lightbearer. |
Document |
[untitled]
If it is just to punish the author of arguments which may incite to violence; if Emma Goldman was justly hounded by the police and imprisoned because it was at first reported that Czolgosz said he was influenced by her words to kill McKinley, why is McKinley’s Secretary of State exempt? The foreging [sic] lines from his pen are infinitely more revolutionary than anything in Emma Goldman’s lecture, “Modern Phases of Anarchism,” which it is asserted was heard by Czolgosz. The last three lines have appeared as the motto of “Liberty,” a pioneer Anarchist paper, for seventeen or eighteen years. Perhaps Czolgosz read and was “fired” by these lines. It is but fair to add that Hay would now disavow the sentiments here expressed. But such disavowal would be no protection from tactics such as those used against Emma Goldman. In her case the newspapers resurrected sentences alleged to have been used by her which if she ever uttered were spoken nearly ten years ago in the heat of a big strike in New York. No allowance was made for the time which had elapsed, nor the possible change of view, nor was the explanatory context given. If such tactics are justifiable in dealing with one, why not with the other? If the jail is the proper place for Emma Goldman, why not for John Hay? Will our Secretary of State be deported to the proposed island along with the rest of the propagators of Anarchism?