Publication information |
Source: Lucifer, the Light-Bearer Source type: magazine Document type: article Document title: “Emma Goldman Defines Her Position” Author(s): Goldman, Emma Date of publication: 21 November 1901 Volume number: 5 Issue number: 45 Series: third series Pagination: 366 |
Citation |
Goldman, Emma. “Emma Goldman Defines Her Position.” Lucifer, the Light-Bearer 21 Nov. 1901 v5n45 (3rd series): p. 366. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Emma Goldman (public statements); Emma Goldman; McKinley assassination (personal response: anarchists); Leon Czolgosz; anarchists; McKinley assassination (public response: anarchists); anarchism; society (impact on Czolgosz); William McKinley (criticism). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Notes |
Click here to
view the report in Lucifer No. 889 that Goldman refers to (below).
The date of publication provided by the magazine is November 21, E.
M. 301.
Whole No. 892.
Alternate magazine title: Lucifer, the Lightbearer. |
Document |
Emma Goldman Defines Her Position
In Lucifer No. 889 was printed a report that
at a meeting of the Manhattan Liberal Club I deplored the assassination of McKinley.
This is a misrepresentation, for at that particular meeting there was no particular
occasion to either deplore or applaud the assassination, consequently I made
no such statements. Besides, in my article on the Buffalo tragedy in Free Society
of Oct. 6 I plainly and emphatically stated my position, and instead of retracting
I could only add that I have since come to the firm conclusion that Czolgosz
was a man with the beautiful soul of a child and the energy of a giant. I have
observed with great sorrow that the majority of Anarchists have utterly failed
to comprehend the depth of that soul, that was put to death by organized authority
on Oct. 29.
Methinks that Anarchy is the philosophy of life,
and as such it includes every branch of human knowledge pertaining to life.
If this be so, and I know of no Anarchists who would deny it, Anarchists ought
to be students of psychology and honestly endeavor to explain certain phenomena,
not only from a politico-economic but also from a psychological standpoint.
Had they done so, they would not have joined the thoughtless rabble in its superficial
denunciation of Leon Czolgosz as a lunatic and a villain. Do not we know that
every act which ignorant minds have failed to explain, have ever been stamped
as insane or villainous?
Surely it does not behoove thinking people to
adopt such methods in their search for a cause for certain acts. Besides, is
it not time to perceive that the act of Sept. 6, like many previous acts, was
but the result of the elements pent up and stifled in the human heart through
a false and pernicious system and bound to leap through the heavy walls of organized
authority sooner or later?
Of course I believe that each individual has a
right to his opinion, but I do not wish to be a party in the vain endeavor of
some of our Anarchists to bow before respectability by sacrificing their ideas
to its altar.
It has taken all my time for the past fourteen
years to deplore human misery in all its awful forms, so I have not a moment
left to deplore the assassination of one, who has ignored all rights of the
people, and bowed before the dictum of a privileged few; then, too, I am kept
busy regretting the fact that so many even in the radical ranks have lost their
manhood and womanhood at the sight of Government and Power let loose, and have
denounced the man, who was so pitiful in his loneliness and yet so sublime in
his silence and superiority over his enemies.
New York, Nov. 11.