Anarchism and Atheism
To the Editor of the S
R.
Wick Court, near Bristol, 1 October, 1901.
S,—Though
this letter is belated for publication, I cannot refrain from writing
to suggest that the underlying reason for the world’s outburst against
anarchists has been missed. The foul murder of Mr. McKinley does
not, even in the present age, stand alone for brutal cruelty. We,
now living, have experienced as foul murders of Armenians by the
Turk and of Chinamen by the Russian. All qua the particular facts
equally excite our horror and disgust. But I think it will be admitted
that mankind generally regards the late murder in the United States
as distinct in kind; I think the horror and disgust it excites are
also distinct in kind. If this be so we must look beyond the particular
fact of the murder of the particular man. Some deep-seated feeling
in mankind must have been affected which was untouched by the other
equally brutal murders.
I venture to think that whatever men
declare with their lips there is in nearly all a deep-seated belief
in an ultimate living cause, in a living God. Even if this feeling
be merely instinctive, a bare survival or an unconscious effort
(?) at solving the lesser difficulty by the creation of a greater,
I think it exists. Now as surely as it is a necessary axiom for
the true socialist that a conscious ultimate Deity exists, so surely
is it a necessary axiom for the true anarchist that a conscious
ultimate Deity does not exist.
The anarchists’ axiomatic denial of
a living first cause explains, I think, the exceptional horror and
disgust we feel at the President’s murder. Consciously or unconsciously
our deep-seated belief in God is outraged—the murderer is not a
mere human offender, he is a conspirator against heaven.
I remain,
Yours truly,
F. C. C.
|