| Protecting the President      Ever since the assassination 
              of President McKinley the feeling has been practically universal 
              throughout the country that some law must be enacted to provide 
              better protection against anarchist crimes. Such a law has now been 
              passed by congress. It provides that the murder or attempted murder 
              of a President or of an official in the line of Presidential succession 
              shall be a crime against federal law and shall be tried in the federal 
              courts. Death is the penalty fixed for such a murder, while the 
              would-be assassin who attempts to kill the President but fails, 
              may be either executed or subjected to a long imprisonment, the 
              minimum term being ten years. In addition, the law provides that 
              those who advocate or inspire such crimes shall be punishable by 
              either fine or imprisonment.It is not to be supposed that any 
              statutory decree will put an end to anarchy or afford a perfect 
              safeguard against anarchial crimes. Murderous fanaticism is not 
              to be wiped out by edict, as the history of Russia makes painfully 
              clear. The new law, however, provides a sure and reasonably expeditious 
              method of bringing criminals of this class to trial and effective 
              punishment. Those who may contemplate such crimes have warning in 
              advance that in whatever state they may attempts the deed, and whether 
              they succeed or fail, they will be punished. Moreover, those who 
              have misused the liberty of speech to advocate crime will no longer 
              feel so free to impart criminal teachings to such mentally warped 
              and morally weak creatures as Czolgosz.
 Taken together with the new regulations 
              restricting the immigration of anarchists, the law should have the 
              effect of checking the spread of crime and restraining the individual 
              anarchist. At the same time it is in no sense an extreme measure 
              and imposes no restrictions that any fair-minded citizen can regard 
              as an invasion of constitutional rights or privileges.
 |