Music as an Antidote to Anarchism
Among the many medicines for anarchism
which are of late suggested from many quarters (as if in a general
“conspiracy of silence” about the Gospel being the one true remedy),
music has occurred to some prescribers, whose memory has naturally
turned to the following old verses:—
“That naught so stockish, hard, and full of rage,
“But music for the time doth change
his nature;
“The man that hath no music in
himself,
“Nor is not moved with concord
of sweet sounds,
“Is fit for treasons, stratagems,
and spoils;
“The motions of his spirit are
as dull as night,
“And his affections dark as Erebus.”
We would revive here a little of
our former contention that the field of operation of music is the
nervous system, and so, emotional rather than spiritual. “Every
soldier,” says an investigator, “will testify to the inspiring influence
of music in war. This, scientifically considered, means simply that
sound-vibrations act directly upon the nerves;” similarly “under
the power of an eight-foot organ pipe many a man has mistaken the
shaking of his diaphram for the trembling of his soul.” What we
have objected to is the mistaking of emotions, whether grossly or
artistically manufactured, for the inspiration of the Holy One.
The purpose of these lines is to introduce
an editorial found in last week’s Christian Advocate, a leading
Methodist paper, and entitled, “More than music needed:”
A convention of choirmasters and music
teachers in England received a prophecy from their president that
anarchism would “die a sweet natural death.” His theory is:
The softening influence of music is
so delightful that the time will come when the inability to sing
from sol fa will be as extraordinary as the inability to read or
write. When the spread of music has reached the required degree
anarchism will cease.”
Goldwin Smith in a recent article,
attaches some importance to this.
Vegetarians are claiming that their
method will put an end to anarchism and assassination. Against this
is the fact that some of the most bloodthirsty peoples of antiquity
were vegetarians, that the assassin of President McKinley hated
meat, and for five or six weeks before his deed, lived on four quarts
of milk and a few cakes per day. He could not bear the sight of
pork.
The effect of music is undoubtedly
refining, but it seems to help everything it is applied to.
In a war, music stimulates people on the wrong as much as it does
those on the right side. Some troops of brigands have been famous
musicians, and have entered towns disguised as peripatetic performers
on various instruments. Atheistic societies have made considerable
use of music in their meetings. Music was by no means suspended
during the first French Revolution. Few countries have made such
progress in music or hear it more frequently than Italy. The people
all sing, but they would hardly be regarded as unproductive of anarchists
or as of a placid temperament indisposed to resort to violence.
History records music in connection with the most oppressive persecution
of religionists, and on Easter the people of Spain pass from the
splendid music of the churches and cathedrals direct to the bull
fights, whose season, in harmony with ancient custom, opens on Easter
day.
We are aware that Napoleon said: “Of
all the liberal arts music has the greatest influence over the passions,
and is that to which the legislator ought to give the greatest encouragement.
A well-composed song strikes and soothes the mind, and produces
a greater effect than a small work, which convinces our reason but
does not warm our feelings, nor effect the slightest alteration
in our habits.”
But Napoleon said this at St. Helena
when he was in a reflective mood. All the music he ever heard failed
to change his essential character.
Musically inclined races have never
been specially free from excesses, nor notably moral.
Music is [used for] assistance to
true religion. But the feelings which it excites are often mistaken
for deeper moral changes.
The teaching of music to both sexes
is refining, but to bring it forward as in itself sufficient to
destroy or check those elements of human nature from which anarchism
arises, or as the main thing to be relied upon to mitigate human
excesses of thought, feeling, action or speech, or to change the
nature, except “for the time,” as Shakespeare says, is but to propose
another panacea which will disappoint. Only a union of all methods
of reformation—instruction in religion, morals and refinement—the
constant employment of them, and the regeneration of the human heart
by the Holy Spirit can prevent those convulsions of human nature
which astound the world by such sudden outbreaks, when a large majority
of those who are thus astonished are more or less under the power
of the same imperfect or distorted development.
|