| Hearst and American People  HEARST’S celebrated defense, appearing simultaneously 
              in his three newspapers, differing only in the personalities it 
              indulges and grandiloquently addressed “to the American people,” 
              has been on the market long enough to enable judgment of its effect.After it appeared in New York, the 
              American people stopped their subscriptions and refused to receive 
              his paper from the carriers when it was offered free. They excluded 
              it from their houses and places of business. Then Hearst had his 
              paper wrapped like a parcel of merchandise and delivered by special 
              messengers. This plan failed. One of the American people in New 
              York investigated the subject, and in a public communication said: 
              “They have prepared thousands of copies done up in this manner to 
              leave at every house, store and office. Nearly every American District 
              Telegraph messenger office in the city has one or more thousands 
              so prepared, with orders to distribute. This looks as if the yellow 
              was on its last legs.”
 Ladies sent to other papers like letters 
              to warn mothers against this sinister plan to sneak Hearst’s paper 
              into families of the American people. Clubs, composed of the American 
              people, excluded it from their rooms and entered an order suspending 
              for a month any member who brought it within their rooms or read 
              it there. In the street cars ladies refused to occupy seats alongside 
              of men who were reading Hearst’s papers, giving their reasons to 
              be heard by all the passengers. In some cases the readers threw 
              the sheet out of the window and apologized. In all cases they threw 
              it, and were cheered by the crowd of passengers.
 In his proclamation to the American 
              people Hearst asked the question, who hate the Examiner, in Chicago 
              the American, and in New York the Journal, and answered it: “Those 
              whom it has fought, and those who have been hurt in the newspaper 
              business by a success which is at once a rebuke to incapacity and 
              in infuriating provocation to envy and jealousy.”
 Judged by their denunciations of Hearst 
              and his papers, he has “fought” a majority of the clergy of the 
              United States and the presidents of colleges and universities. He 
              has fought Archbishop Riordan of this city, bishops and clergy of 
              the Episcopal and Methodist churches, the pastors of all the churches 
              governed by the presbytery, and all the churches that have congregational 
              government, for they have joined in expressing the hatred that good 
              men feel for him and his style of journalism. Then he has fought 
              the G. A. R., for its sentiments were expressed in a national memorial 
              which said of him “he is a Judas with the addition of disguise and 
              modern enterprise. His seeds of murder, hate and anarchy, fructify 
              into crimes like the assassination of President McKinley.” He has 
              fought the thousands of club organizations and commercial bodies 
              which have outlawed his papers and the hundreds of thousands of 
              men and women who join the Rev. George Francis Whittemore in saying: 
              “Who for gain tempts men to crime, let his name be anathema.”
 In his proclamation “to the American 
              people” Hearst announces that in the future, as in the past, his 
              papers will “be human and animated and entertaining” indulging “the 
              light word and funny picture”; and protests that is all he has done, 
              and all that makes people stop his paper, outlaw and exclude it, 
              refuse information to his unfortunate reporters, and even order 
              from their doorsteps district messenger boys who try to deliver 
              it wrapped up like linen from the laundry.
 He is right. His idea of being human 
              and entertaining, and the light and funny picture, is in issue. 
              It was to be human and entertaining that he used these light words: 
              “McKinley’s is a dull brain. It is a milk and water brain.”—“McKinley 
              and his Wall-street Cabinet are ready to surrender every particle 
              of national honor and dignity.”—“The people must decide between 
              conservative remedies now, and desperate remedies later.”—“The world’s 
              achievements and great changes have all come from discontent, and 
              you should be, in as many ways as possible, a breeder of discontent 
              among the human beings around you.”—“The time of dissolution is 
              at hand. Twenty corporations own the President and virtually exercise 
              the functions of government.”—“So what we hear that this republic 
              is in danger now, just remember what a short time intervened between 
              the King (of France), alive and drinking, and the King dead, and 
              the peasants all eating.”—“McKinley plays the coward and shivers 
              white-faced. He makes an international cur of his country; he is 
              an abject, weak, futile, incompetent poltroon. He is, therefore, 
              the most despised and hated creature in the hemisphere.”
 These “light words,” and “human and 
              entertaining” sentiments, were illustrated by Mr. Hearst’s idea 
              of funny pictures, representing the President idiotically applauding 
              the starving and murder of the common people, or as a negro minstrel, 
              singing coon songs. Really, Mr. Hearst is too human and entertaining 
              in his way and too funny after his idea for the American people. 
              They believe him to be a blackguard, an envenomed pervert and degenerate, 
              and his papers unfit to enter a decent family, club or place of 
              business. That seems to be the only difference at present existing 
              between Hearst and the American people.
 |