Publication information |
Source: Essays Source type: book Document type: essay Document title: “Anarchism and Crime” Author(s): Labadie, Jo Publisher: Labadie Shop Place of publication: Detroit, Michigan Year of publication: 1911 Pagination: 9-29 (excerpt below includes only pages 22-24) |
Citation |
Labadie, Jo. “Anarchism and Crime.” Essays. Detroit: Labadie Shop, 1911: pp. 9-29. |
Transcription |
excerpt of essay |
Keywords |
anarchism; McKinley assassination (public response: criticism); Leon Czolgosz. |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; James A. Garfield; William Goebel; Carter H. Harrison, Sr.; Tom L. Johnson; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley; Peter Witt. |
Notes |
From title page: The Labadie Booklets. |
Document |
Anarchism and Crime [excerpt]
Now, have you any true idea what Anarchism aims
to do? You have been told they want to kill the rich and divide their goods
equally; that every Anarchist goes about like a battle ship, armed to the turret
with whiskey bottles and dynamite and daggers and guns and bombs. If you believe
this kind of stuff then you are indeed as gullible and foolish as the plunderbund,
press, pulpit and politicians think you are. It is quite natural, however, for
one inclined to these things himself to think others are also. [22][23]
In the absence of knowledge to the contrary one is apt to judge others by himself.
Nearly every assassination, every murder, crime of every description against
public men and women for years past has been imputed to Anarchists. It is a
wonder they were not charged with the killing of Lincoln and Garfield and Goebel
and Harrison and others. Indeed, President McKinley’s death was certainly taxed
to Anarchism, notwithstanding the fact that it was proven that the poor unfortunate
Czolgosz was a republican, voted at republican primaries, and no doubt was insane
as the result of a boyish vice. These facts come to me by letter from Peter
Witt, city clerk of Cleveland while Tom L. Johnson was mayor. Mr. Witt will
undoubtedly give you the facts too if you ask him.
“Czolgosz was not an Anarchist,” writes Mr. Witt.
“To charge that he was is simply ridiculous. He was * *
* insane. In politics he was a republican, and
as such voted at the republican primaries for several years. This fact I brought
out shortly after the assassination by going over the election records. These
records have since been destroyed, not because [23][24]
of what they contained but to make room for later ones. His father and brothers
voted at the same primaries.”
This ought to forever silence the criminal charge
that Anarchism was responsible for the assassination of McKinley. But it probably
will not. This kind of a lie dies hard.
From my point of view the killing of another,
except in defense of human life, is Archistic, authoritarian, and, therefore,
no Anarchistic can do so. It is the very opposite of what Anarchism stands for.
Can one be an Anarchist and do Archistic acts any more than one can do anti-christian
deeds and be a christian at the same time? Can one steal and be honest? Can
one go east and west simultaneously? Is up and down the same thing?