| Publication information |
|
Source: Medical News Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “The Criminal, Czolgosz” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 4 January 1902 Volume number: 80 Issue number: 1 Pagination: 36 |
| Citation |
| “The Criminal, Czolgosz.” Medical News 4 Jan. 1902 v80n1: p. 36. |
| Transcription |
| full text |
| Keywords |
| Medical News; Leon Czolgosz (autopsy); Leon Czolgosz (mental health). |
| Named persons |
| Leon Czolgosz; Carlos F. MacDonald; William McKinley; Edward A. Spitzka. |
| Document |
The Criminal, Czolgosz
I current number
of the M N we present
to our readers a full report of the trial, execution, autopsy and mental status
of Leon F. Czolgosz, the assassin of President McKinley, together with a report
of the anatomical measurements made during life by the Bertillon system, and
of the postmortem findings, including anatomical measurements of the head, face,
skull, etc., also a graphic anatomical description of the hemicerebra, with
plates of the drawings and of photographs—full face and profile—of a postmortem
plaster cast of the head, which altogether present a very comprehensive study
of the physical, mental and moral status of the most remarkable criminal magnicide
of the age.
The joint report of Dr. Carlos F. MacDonald and
Mr. Spitzka, aside from its historic importance, is replete with interest to
the medical jurist and forms a valuable contribution to the study of criminal
psychology. The report is also of interest, negatively, to the psychopathologist
as showing that the assassin, Czolgosz, was neither a lunatic nor a so-called
degenerate. On the contrary, his history and all the facts in the case, as stated,
make straightway [sic] for sanity and full responsibility for his act.
Moreover, it is gratifying to note that all of the mental experts who examined
Czolgosz—three for the people and two for the defence—one of the latter having
been selected by the Bar Association with special reference to his competency—agreed
unanimously that he was sane and responsible, thus leaving no room for reasonable
doubt respecting his mental status. Surely the snap diagnosis of insanity which
has already been gravely proclaimed in certain quarters, and which necessarily
is based only on exaggerated and sensational newspaper reports, should have
no weight against the opinions of the official, and presumably competent, experts,
based on personal examinations of the culprit and accurate knowledge of all
the facts and circumstances in the case, opinions that are fully sustained by
the postmortem findings.