Mr. Roosevelt’s Theory of the Vice-Presidency
In doing this, Mr. Roosevelt was not only true to
his quick instinct as to the course that would reassure and satisfy
the country, but he was also acting in accordance with his own theory
as to the proper relationship between the two offices of President
and Vice President. On this subject he expressed himself clearly
in an article that he wrote for this magazine during the campaign
of 1896. Mr. Hobart had then been nominated on the ticket with Mr.
McKinley. In the article to which we refer, published in September,
1896, Mr. Roosevelt reviewed the history of the Vice-Presidential
nominations, and criticised sharply the custom “of offering the
Vice-Presidency as a consolation prize to be given in many cases
to the very men who were most bitterly opposed to the nomination
of the successful candidate for President.” Mr. Roosevelt went on
to show how, on the death of the elder Harrison, “the Presidency
fell into the hands of a man who had but a corporal’s guard of supporters
in the nation, and who proceeded to oppose all the measures of the
immense majority of those who elected him.” In the case of the death
of President Lincoln, Mr. Roosevelt remarks that “Johnson was put
on the ticket largely for geographical reasons, and on the death
of Lincoln he tried to reverse the policy of the party which had
put him in office.” His historical comment upon a more recent case
proceeds as follows:
An instance of an entirely different
kind is afforded by Garfield and Arthur. The differences between
these two party leaders were mainly merely factional. Each stood
squarely on the platform of the party, and all the principles
advocated by one were advocated by the other; yet the death
of Garfield meant a complete overturn in the personnel of the
upper Republican officials, because Arthur had been nominated
expressly to placate the group of party leaders who most objected
to the nomination of Garfield. Arthur made a very good President,
but the bitterness caused by his succession to power nearly
tore the party in twain.
Mr. Roosevelt’s own
theory was that the Vice-President should be selected with very
distinct reference to the fact that he might at any moment be called
upon to act as President, in view of which he ought, at the outset,
to be in recognized harmony with the President’s policy and practical
administration, and ought, further, to be kept in touch by close
consultation. Under these circumstances, the Vice-President, being
part and parcel of the administration, so to speak, would step quietly
into the executive office in case of the President’s death, and
continue the administration with as little shock, uncertainty, or
change as possible. On these matters Mr. Roosevelt expressed himself,
in words that have now a peculiar interest, as follows:
The Vice-President should so
far as possible represent the same views and principles which
have secured the nomination and election of the President, and
he should be a man standing well in the councils of the party,
trusted by his fellow-party leaders, and able, in the event
of any accident to his chief, to take up the work of the latter
just where it was left. The Republican party has this year nominated
such a man in the person of Mr. Hobart. But nominations of this
kind have by no means been always the rule of recent years.
No change of parties, for instance, could well produce a greater
revolution in policy than would have been produced at almost
any time during the last three years if Mr. Cleveland had died
and Mr. Stevenson had succeeded him.
One sure way to secure this desired
result would undoubtedly be to increase the power of the Vice-President.
He should always be a man who would be consulted by the President
on every great party question. It would be very well if he were
given a seat in the cabinet. It might be well if in addition
to his vote in the Senate in the event of a tie he should be
given a vote, on ordinary occasions, and perchance on occasions
a voice in the debates. A man of the character of Mr. Hobart
is sure to make his weight felt in an administration, but the
power of thus exercising influence should be made official rather
than personal.
|