Publication information |
Source: Coming Nation Source type: magazine Document type: editorial column Document title: “Comment on Things Doing” Author(s): Russell, Charles Edward Date of publication: 2 November 1912 Volume number: none Issue number: 112 Series: new series Pagination: 3-4 |
Citation |
Russell, Charles Edward. “Comment on Things Doing.” Coming Nation 2 Nov. 1912 n112 (new series): pp. 3-4. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
Hearst newspapers (role in the assassination); McKinley assassination (public response). |
Named persons |
Arthur Brisbane; Leon Czolgosz; William Randolph Hearst; William McKinley; Frederick Burr Opper; John F. Schrank. |
Document |
Comment on Things Doing [excerpt]
A BIT OF HISTORY
FOR the benefit of those of a persistently blithesome view of Capitalism in
the United States, here are a few facts that may be deemed pertinent on the
present occasion.
At the time Czolgosz shot President McKinley the
power in this country that the Capitalists most hated and feared was the power
of William Randolph Hearst. He has since seen fit to join hands with his former
deadly foes, but there is no doubt that their detestation of him was then both
savage and sincere.
The assassination of the president gave them what
they believed was their opportunity to destroy Hearst. The Hearst papers had
printed some cartoons ridiculing McKinley and some foolish editorials by Brisbane
that might be construed as personal attacks. Mr. McKinley himself was so far
from resenting these things that he used to laugh about them, and sent to Opper
for the original drawing of one of the cartoons. But the scheme of the Capitalists
was to create the belief that the assassin had been inflamed and instigated
by these attacks and to throw the responsibility for the murder upon Hearst.
It happened that, united as to the main object,
they were divided as to the best means. Some believed that Hearst could be indicted
[3][4] as accessory before the fact, convicted
and hanged, and secured the opinion of a very eminent authority that such a
plan was perfectly feasible. Others thought the best way was to create such
a frenzy of public indignation that Hearst would be lynched.
To this end the story was prepared and widely
circulated that copies of a Hearst paper containing some of the McKinley cartoons
had been found in the pocket of Czolgosz and more in his lodgings. Some of the
same journals that are now asserting that Schrank is a Socialist helped them
to spread the other lie. The Catholic priest that had been Czolgosz’s confessor
was approached and offers were made to him of great sums of money for himself
or for his church if he would say that Czolgosz had told him of reading a Hearst
paper. The priest indignantly spurned the proposal. Desperate efforts were made
to find some alleged friend or acquaintance of the assassin that would make
a similar statement. Some were reported, but were promptly run down and proved
to be mythical.
All the time the kept press continued to print
the most inflammatory appeals to prejudice and passion. At one time a mob was
organized in Brooklyn with the avowed purpose of marching to Manhattan and hanging
Hearst, but being composed only of shifty criminals and hired thugs its courage
gave out before it had reached the bridge.
And yet all the time Czolgosz was an absolute
maniac with a badly diseased brain. He was not even an Anarchist. He was merely
insane. The mental examination before his trial indicated this and the autopsy
after he had been put to death gave additional ground for the conclusion.
Nothing but the failure of the American people
to be as hysterical and hare-brained as the Capitalists believed them to be
prevented his mad and terrible deed from being followed by others still more
bloody. The purpose of the Capitalists was there and would be there again under
similar conditions.