Publication information |
Source: Hamilton Review Source type: magazine Document type: article Document title: “The Death Penalty” Author(s): Naylor, A. H. Date of publication: December 1901 Volume number: 15 Issue number: 3 Pagination: 75-77 |
Citation |
Naylor, A. H. “The Death Penalty.” Hamilton Review Dec. 1901 v15n3: pp. 75-77. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Leon Czolgosz (execution); Leon Czolgosz (execution: personal response); death penalty. |
Named persons |
Thomas Barrett; Harry H. Bender; Leon Czolgosz; Henry VIII; Marie Joseph Lafayette; Daniel O’Connell; Peter Robinson; Samuel Zephon. |
Document |
The Death Penalty
It is the 29th day of October, 1901. Here and
there a faint streak of sunlight begins to creep down the walls which loom up
on every side, and across the courts. Without, the humdrum rattle and roar of
awakening life betokens the advent of another day. Within, the silence is maddening.
Far up the corridor appears a strange and solemn procession. As it passes window
after window the faces pressed against the cold bars look unusually drawn and
white. Not a word, not a sound passes their lips as the little band wends its
way to the chamber of official murder. The central figure, straight and firm,
eagerly steps forward, stumbles slightly on the mat before the chair and then
sinks down into its ghastly apparatus. Swiftly and silently the straps are adjusted,
while the [75][76] victim in a low, unbroken tone
speaks his last. At a sign from the warden the switch is turned, and like a
flash that human form straightens and stiffens until the leather bands which
hold it break the awful silence with their sickening creak. Once, twice, thrice,
his body stiffens and relaxes. As it is released and laid upon the table, the
awe-stricken spectators hasten one by one from the room.
O, nation, where is thy virtue? Where is thy God?
True, a noble man was sacrificed—shot down at the hand of an assassin. And his
was a martyr’s death. A nation, a world bowed with terrible heartache over his
grave. Men, women and children rose in wrath against the murder. Their frenzy
was fearful to behold. The cowardly assassin must be punished.
Yet now that both have passed beyond this world
into the presence of their Maker, we ask whether or not our purpose has been
achieved. Have we deterred? Have we reformed? Have we warned?
We have not prevented murder. The death penalty
has slain its thousands and tens of thousands, but still its awful work goes
on and its power is defied. The seventy-two thousand executions during the reign
of Henry VIII. did not put a check to crime. It even provoked new outrages.
The recent execution of Zephon at Philadelphia, did not prevent four other murders
near the scene within two days. The hanging of Barrett at Worcester for rape
and murder, did not prevent another murder close at hand within ten days. It
has been in operation for five thousand years and has done its best. When, O
when, will the term of trial end?
We have not reformed the assassin. The thought
of death is not the most terrible. The sick die calmly. Thousands have gone
down on the battle-field. Suicides are common. Robinson, of New Jersey, standing
on the scaffold called for a band and 20,000 spectators, declaring that he had
suffered too much poverty and misery in this life to care very much about leaving
it. Czolgosz entered the chamber of death the coolest man of that company. He
died with a curse upon his lips, and with the assertion that he was not sorry
for his crime. Far from reforming, we launched him into an eternity whence repentance
comes too late. We took from him all chance of a better life, of reform, and
self-realization. “Thou shalt not kill,” saith Jehovah. Here is an obligation
to guard the sanctity of life most scrupulously. Christianity makes the taking
of human life doubtful and fearful. For life is the immediate gift of God to
man—which neither he can resign nor can it be taken from him, except by the
will of Him who gave it.
On the other hand, official killings have done
irrevocable wrong. In their attempts to punish the murderer, they have themselves
been slayers of innocent blood. Lafayette said: “I shall ask for [76][77]
the abolition of the penalty of death until I have the infallibility of human
judgment demonstrated.” O’Connell says: “I myself defended three brothers of
the name Cremming [sic], within the last ten years. They were indicted for murder.
I sat at my window as they passed by after sentence of death had been pronounced.
Their mother was there, and she, armed with the strength of affection, broke
through the guard. I saw her clasp her eldest son, who was but twenty-two years
of age; I saw her hang on the neck of her second, who was not twenty; I saw
her faint when she clung to the neck of her youngest boy, who was but eighteen.
And I ask, what recompense could be made for such agony? They were executed—and—they
were innocent.”
Let law and religion be supreme. Let the weak
be helped, the violent restrained, not destroyed. Let the guilty be punished.
They should be punished. Let them know that they will be punished, surely and
justly. Let the murderer, the violator of God’s holy law, and the destroyer
of man’s sacred life, know that he will suffer—not by his own blood, but by
exile and lonely solitude, where repentance and bitter remorse are certain.
Let each one of us say with Mr. Bender, who was there on that awful morning,
“I want never to see another.”