Publication information |
Source: Liberty Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Logic and Common Sense” Author(s): Tucker, Benjamin R. Date of publication: September 1903 Volume number: 14 Issue number: 13 Pagination: 5 |
Citation |
Tucker, Benjamin R. “Logic and Common Sense.” Liberty Sept. 1903 v14n13: p. 5. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
Ernest Howard Crosby; Leon Czolgosz; McKinley assassination (personal response: anarchists); McKinley assassination (personal response). |
Named persons |
William Jennings Bryan; Ernest Howard Crosby; Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Notes |
Click here to view an excerpt from Crosby’s response (Whim, Oct. 1903) to Tucker’s editorial. |
Document |
Logic and Common Sense [excerpt]
To my paragraph of some months ago criticising
my friend Ernest Crosby for opposing violence and at the same time abetting
the State, he answers, in his interesting and illogical journal, the “Whim”
(if you wish a sample copy, address P. O. Box 288, Newark, N. J.), that he pleads
guilty and alleges extenuating circumstances. These circumstances are the remorse
that he felt after declining to vote in 1896, and the happiness that he felt
after voting for Bryan in 1900. But all the doers of violence whom Mr. Crosby
so persistently denounces can offer the same plea. Mr. McKinley undoubtedly
felt supremely happy in pursuing the policy which Mr. Crosby is fond of characterizing
as “island-stealing and manslaughter.” If to do the things that one feels happy
in doing is a good excuse, why has Mr. Crosby never given Mr. McKinley the benefit
of it?
“We preach logic and practise common sense,” further
answers Mr. Crosby, “for the secret of sane living is to go on compromising
while shouting ‘No compromise’.” Yes, I remember very well and very painfully
that a couple of years ago, when a young man by the name of Czolgosz, who “preached
logic,”—that is to say, who dreamed, as Mr. Crosby dreams, of a time when violence
shall be no more,—also “practised common sense,”—that is to say, resorted, as
Mr. Crosby resorts, to violence when it made him happy to do so,—Mr. Crosby,
who preaches not only logic, but also universal love, ignored this other gospel
too, and adhered to his practice of common sense by promptly joining the snarling
human pack and denouncing Czolgosz as “a perverted wretch.” Yet the offence
of this young man, who compromised his logical ideal by shooting McKinley as
Mr. Crosby continually compromises his logical ideal by voting for invasive
laws, consisted simply in a discovery of Mr. Crosby’s “secret of sane living.”
Why should Mr. Crosby exhaust the vocabulary of hatred in describing the conduct
of those who share his secret? And, on the other hand, why should I put questions
such as these to Mr. Crosby? Nothing can embarrass a man who “preaches logic
and practises common sense.”