| Publication information | 
| Source: Liberty Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Logic and Common Sense” Author(s): Tucker, Benjamin R. Date of publication: September 1903 Volume number: 14 Issue number: 13 Pagination: 5 | 
| Citation | 
| Tucker, Benjamin R. “Logic and Common Sense.” Liberty Sept. 1903 v14n13: p. 5. | 
| Transcription | 
| excerpt | 
| Keywords | 
| Ernest Howard Crosby; Leon Czolgosz; McKinley assassination (personal response: anarchists); McKinley assassination (personal response). | 
| Named persons | 
| William Jennings Bryan; Ernest Howard Crosby; Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. | 
| Notes | 
| Click here to view an excerpt from Crosby’s response (Whim, Oct. 1903) to Tucker’s editorial. | 
| Document | 
  Logic and Common Sense [excerpt]
     To my paragraph of some months ago criticising 
  my friend Ernest Crosby for opposing violence and at the same time abetting 
  the State, he answers, in his interesting and illogical journal, the “Whim” 
  (if you wish a sample copy, address P. O. Box 288, Newark, N. J.), that he pleads 
  guilty and alleges extenuating circumstances. These circumstances are the remorse 
  that he felt after declining to vote in 1896, and the happiness that he felt 
  after voting for Bryan in 1900. But all the doers of violence whom Mr. Crosby 
  so persistently denounces can offer the same plea. Mr. McKinley undoubtedly 
  felt supremely happy in pursuing the policy which Mr. Crosby is fond of characterizing 
  as “island-stealing and manslaughter.” If to do the things that one feels happy 
  in doing is a good excuse, why has Mr. Crosby never given Mr. McKinley the benefit 
  of it?
       “We preach logic and practise common sense,” further 
  answers Mr. Crosby, “for the secret of sane living is to go on compromising 
  while shouting ‘No compromise’.” Yes, I remember very well and very painfully 
  that a couple of years ago, when a young man by the name of Czolgosz, who “preached 
  logic,”—that is to say, who dreamed, as Mr. Crosby dreams, of a time when violence 
  shall be no more,—also “practised common sense,”—that is to say, resorted, as 
  Mr. Crosby resorts, to violence when it made him happy to do so,—Mr. Crosby, 
  who preaches not only logic, but also universal love, ignored this other gospel 
  too, and adhered to his practice of common sense by promptly joining the snarling 
  human pack and denouncing Czolgosz as “a perverted wretch.” Yet the offence 
  of this young man, who compromised his logical ideal by shooting McKinley as 
  Mr. Crosby continually compromises his logical ideal by voting for invasive 
  laws, consisted simply in a discovery of Mr. Crosby’s “secret of sane living.” 
  Why should Mr. Crosby exhaust the vocabulary of hatred in describing the conduct 
  of those who share his secret? And, on the other hand, why should I put questions 
  such as these to Mr. Crosby? Nothing can embarrass a man who “preaches logic 
  and practises common sense.”