The Trial of Czolgosz
The assassin of President McKinley was tried, convicted, and condemned
to death last week. The trial, including the securing of the jury,
occupied only two days, and the actual time of the sessions of the
court was eight hours and a half. The sentence was pronounced two
days later. It is worth while to note the extraordinary promptness
and brevity of the trial as contrasted with the sensational, tedious,
and wearing sessions of Guiteau’s trial and of such murder cases
as that of Molineux. The State of New York, and in particular the
bench and bar of Erie County, deserve the highest praise for the
dignity and fairness with which the proceedings were conducted from
beginning to end. As we noted last week, Czolgosz was furnished
the aid of the ablest counsel, and his lawyers undertook the case
at a distinct sacrifice to their own inclination and their business
interests. Wisely and honorably, however, they did not hold that
professional duty required them to fight the case on technicalities,
or to present to the jury a defense which they knew to be no defense.
The question of insanity was not raised by the State; the District
Attorney held, and the Court sustained him in his view, that an
assumption of sanity existed, to be dispelled only by direct evidence
to the contrary. No such evidence was introduced, and it is understood
that no alienist who examined Czolgosz considered him of unsound
mind or irresponsible for his act. The address of the prisoner’s
counsel and the charge by the Court both dwelt on the duty of law
observance under all circumstances. Thus, Judge Lewis of counsel,
after commenting on the dangers and criminal doctrines of Anarchism,
pointed out that lynch law is in itself anarchism. In this respect,
he said, the trial of Czolgosz should be a great object lesson to
the world. In the same line of thought, Justice White in charging
the jury declared that no higher tribute could be paid to the dead
President than “to observe that exalted opinion and reverence for
the law which he would ask if he were here.” After the sentence
on Thursday Czolgosz was taken to the prison at Auburn, where he
will undergo the penalty of death on some day during the week beginning
on Monday, the 28th day of October next. The demeanor of the assassin
during the trial was thought by some to be stolid, by others to
show a degree of fear amounting to semi-paralysis as regards outward
actions. He said hardly anything, seemed to have difficulty in understanding
the questions asked him, and his only utterance was, as transmitted
to the Court by his counsel (for he could not speak audibly), the
assertion that no one else had anything whatever to do with the
crime. When taken to Auburn, Czolgosz for a time broke down physically
and morally and had to be carried into the prison. The threatening
demeanor of [242][243] the crowd about
the prison may have had something to do with this. The assassin
is said to have expressed repentance of his crime.
|