Publication information |
Source: Psychopathology Source type: book Document type: book chapter Document title: “The Psychopathology of Paranoia” [chapter 9] Author(s): Kempf, Edward J. Publisher: C. V. Mosby Company Place of publication: St. Louis, Missouri Year of publication: 1920 Pagination: 421-76 (excerpt below includes only pages 439-40) |
Citation |
Kempf, Edward J. “The Psychopathology of Paranoia” [chapter 9]. Psychopathology. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1920: pp. 421-76. |
Transcription |
excerpt of chapter |
Keywords |
presidential assassinations (comparison); Leon Czolgosz (mental health). |
Named persons |
John Wilkes Booth; Leon Czolgosz; James A. Garfield; William W. Godding; Charles J. Guiteau; Allan McLane Hamilton; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley. |
Notes |
From title page: By Edward J. Kempf, M.D., Clinical Psychiatrist to
St. Elizabeths Hospital (Formerly Government Hospital for the Insane),
Washington, D. C.; Author of “The Autonomic Functions and the Personality.”
From title page: Eighty-Seven Illustrations. |
Document |
The Psychopathology of Paranoia [excerpt]
It seems highly desirable, with
the knowledge of the parricidal type of inspiration of Case AN-3, to review
the personalities and acts of Booth and Guiteau. An unprejudiced account of
Czolgosz’s personality, unfortunately, is not accessible.
In Case AN-3 many facts show that the man became
“inspired” to kill his director because the latter, through transferring him
from working in “pure science,” prevented him from ever possibly solving his
biological obsessions thereby compensating for the inferiorities of masturbation
and the sexual affairs that caused the loss of his love-object, who was a mother
image. The director, by his act, unconsciously became the equivalent or image
of the domineering, hateful father who had disastrously suppressed the patient’s
youthful, vital, spontaneous aspirations, which necessarily needed encouragement
and freedom of functioning in order that the personality should later develop
to a comfortable, healthful maturity, and overcome its homosexual and autoerotic
tendencies. This case is of the utmost value, in that it explains the origin
of the inspiration that the suppressive superior must be killed in order that
the freedom of manhood might be realized; hence, the reader should be familiar
with it.
The cases of Booth, the assassin of Lincoln; Guiteau,
the assassin of Garfield; and Czolgosz, who shot McKinley, were not considered
from this point of view by the psychiatrists who advised the court; hence, essential
details are lacking which would convincingly fix the impression that
these men were all obsessed with inspirational compulsions to “remove” the suppressive
fac- [439][440] tor, father-image. There is sufficient
reliable data, however, to be had in W. W. Godding’s “Two Strange Cases” and
A. M. Hamilton’s “Recollections of An Alienist,” to make it worth while to reconsider
these crimes from this new point of view—namely, that the preadolescent affective
repressions finally tried to destroy the repressing influences in order to attain
freedom from sexual inferiority and acquire the functions of maturity.