Publication information |
Source: Bankers’ Magazine Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: none Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 63 Issue number: 4 Pagination: 567-69 |
Citation |
[untitled]. Bankers’ Magazine Oct. 1901 v63n4: pp. 567-69. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
presidential succession (impact on economy); McKinley assassination (impact on economy); Theodore Roosevelt (assumption of presidency). |
Named persons |
Chester A. Arthur; William Jennings Bryan; Grover Cleveland; Millard Fillmore; Lyman J. Gage; James A. Garfield; William Henry Harrison; Andrew Johnson; William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt; Adlai E. Stevenson; Zachary Taylor. |
Document |
[untitled]
THE STRENGTH OF A SYSTEM or organization is shown
by the manner in which it passes through unexpected catastrophes. Five times
in the history of the United States has the ruler of the nation been removed
by death, and in each case the Vice-President has succeeded without any serious
shock to the institutions of the country. There have been changes in policy,
as when the effort of the Whig party to re-establish a Bank of the United States
was defeated by the so-called defection of the new President from their ranks.
To the death of the first HARRISON is no doubt due
all the present disadvantages of the independent Treasury system. FILLMORE
succeeded TAYLOR without much remark. The accession
of JOHNSON, although he also is supposed to have changed
the policy of the Government disadvantageously, did not have any permanently
detrimental effect upon the progress of the country. The death of GARFIELD
and the succession of ARTHUR caused no changes of
general importance.
No doubt these events caused the disappointment
of many personal ambitions, which were probably compensated for by the unexpected
gratification of the personal ambitions of others.
In all the pettier detail of an Administration,
in the selection of persons for offices, and in the flow of the streams of political
influence, the change of one President for another produces considerable effect,
but the general public takes very little interest in these contests for personal
emolument. Under civil-service rules even these personal changes will probably
be reduced to a minimum. The greater interest at the present time manifests
itself, or would have manifested itself, had the belief in the soundness of
Mr. ROOSEVELT’S financial convictions been less certain,
in the monetary question. If the Vice-President had been a man like STEVENSON,
under the last Democratic Administration, who had at that time shown himself
at least a waverer on the silver question, and who subsequently went over body
and soul to BRYAN and free coinage, the death of MCKINLEY
would have given a far greater shock to the money market than was experienced.
One can conceive the consternation in financial circles if CLEVELAND
had died in 1893 and had been succeeded by STEVENSON.
[567][568]
It is well that the importance of the Vice-Presidential
office is beginning to be appreciated, and that the effects of an unwise choice
are being more seriously looked at when the second name on the ticket is chosen
at the national conventions. It is understood more and more that in this industrial
age the success of a party or Administration and their continuation in power
depend on the prosperity of the country.
It is said with some degree of truth that statesmen
and politicians should neither be praised nor blamed for the ebb and flow of
prosperous business; but they are certainly to blame if they do not exert themselves
to fashion the laws and to administer them in the manner best calculated to
economize and make the most of the resources, gathered under the combined forces
of nature working in concert with the energies of the people. To make the crops
good or bad is mainly the work of nature, but there are numberless other resources
which are dependent almost altogether upon human enterprise. So much depends
in business on the feelings of the mind and on a continued cheerful view of
the future, kept within due limits. It is in so carrying on its operations and
shaping its policy as to encourage the most cheerful view of business that the
circumstances will allow, that a government may in reality conduce to the general
prosperity, and likewise in properly suppressing undue tendency to extravagant
views leading to over-trading and disaster.
President MCKINLEY,
perhaps more than any of his predecessors, had, by the training of his whole
career, grown into a recognition of the intimate relations between business
and the operations of the Government in the United States. In appointing a skillful
financier Secretary of the Treasury, he looked carefully to the success of his
Administration by taking care of the pockets of the people. Under all the disadvantage
of an imperfect system for the handling of revenues and expenditures, Secretary
GAGE has held the money available for circulation
with very little fluctuation.
The science of adapting the operations of the
Government to modern industrial needs is yet in its infancy. Rulers all over
the world are beginning to recognize that these industries of the people, which
afford them a means of livelihood and keep them contented and happy, must be
fostered not simply as a basis of taxation, but for their own sakes. Government
must be made secondary to the business of the people.
In his promise to carry out the policy of his
predecessor Mr. ROOSEVELT has reassured the business
interests of the United States, and through them the connected business interests
of other countries.
In one sense no man can guarantee that he will
do just the same as another man would have done in his place. The personal equation
[568][569] is different, and in manner and detail
the action may vary, although the result may be similar. It may be, too, that
the new President, as a younger man, may have less hesitation in recommending
and pushing through financial reform than his predecessor. One thing can be
counted on pretty surely, that some classes of enterprise will go on more slowly
until Mr. ROOSEVELT has marked out the line he intends
to pursue by his actions. He comes into office more unpledged in almost every
direction than any President who has yet gone into the White House.