Notes of the Week [excerpt]
Australia, in common with the rest
of the civilised world, has been profoundly moved by the death of
President M’Kinley. As the news spread on Saturday night, it was
received with all the manifestations of a personal bereavement.
The medical bulletins had been so confident; we had been so repeatedly
assured that there would be a recovery, and that a speedy one, that
the public had come to accept it as all but certain. Even the Vice-President
of the States was so certain that he left on a hunting trip. And
now there is but the pathetic memory that the stricken man begged
his physicians to let him die in peace. Major M’Kinley in life was
a remarkable man, a man of strong courage, steadfastness of purpose,
and great ability. In the manner in which he met his death he raised
himself to a niche in his country’s gallery of heroes for all time.
Millions have been moved to tears by the simple and touching story
of the death chamber at Buffalo, as told in the cable news. It is
pitiful to think that with all our material advancement the greatest
is more than ever at the mercy of the least. The finest intellect
and the noblest character may be extinguished at any moment by the
meanest. From the revolver of a Czolgosz there is no safeguard.
Provided only the fanatic is willing to sacrifice his own life,
he may easily take the other, and the assassination of President
M’Kinley at Buffalo might have as easily had its counterpart in
the assassination of our recent Royal visitor in the Sydney streets.
In either case the crowd would, if permitted, have torn the assassin
limb from limb, but the evil thing would have been done. Perhaps
if such creatures were left to the savage vengeance of crowds, the
punishment would be a greater deterrent than the slower process
of the law, which makes the man a hero to his kind. The Buffalo
crowd, mindful of how Guiteau’s miserable existence was dragged
out by the laws’ [sic] delays after his slaying of President Garfield,
would have lynched Czolgosz had they been able to get at him.
——————————
If President M’Kinley laid down his
office fittingly, his successor has taken it up well. The Vice-President
was so satisfied with the medical assurances of the patient’s safety
that he had gone to that wild paradise of the wealthy New Yorker,
the Adirondacks. And when he was brought back as fast as special
trains could do it to Buffalo, his first act was to go to the widow
of his dead chief, the next to restore international confidence
by re-appointing the Cabinet, and popular confidence and affection
by walking the streets of Buffalo and mingling with its crowds unescorted.
And this though even now an anarchist assassin is hastening to the
States in his behoof. The men who made the American Constitution
builded well. Neither internecine strife nor the assassin’s bullet
nor personal ambition have been able to undo their work. On the
death of a President, the Vice-President succeeds “automatically.”
President Roosevelt was actually sworn in on his flying journey
to Buffalo. An election at such a time would unsettle the State,
so the sturdy fathers of the nation made it unnecessary. But they
gave the succeeding President a free hand with his advisers by requiring
them to resign. It was an open secret that Vice-President Roosevelt,
who represents what may be termed the “Imperialistic” development
of recent American statesmanship, had differences of opinion with
Colonel John Hay, the peculiarly able Secretary of State, because
he considered that the American view in international affairs was
not always pushed with the vigour he would have preferred. Colonel
Hay is an old man, of great experience, and therefore cautious.
To have changed the Cabinet would have been an intimation to the
nations that a new external policy, one of greater aggressiveness,
would be adopted. The immediate reinstatement of the entire Cabinet
was an act making for the peace of the world.
——————————
President Roosevelt is a type of
man who has by the popular prejudice been so far excluded from the
United States presidency. There is in the great Democracy an absurd
prejudice against men of high social position, and a decided suspicion
of men of great wealth in public affairs. They are widely and unjustly
classed as “dudes.” This prejudice has been reciprocated by a corresponding
feeling that it was “bad form” for such men to dabble in politics.
The result has been unfortunate for both sides—we are not without
a somewhat similar sentiment here. To the Government of a democracy
there should go its best element in all ranks. Colonel Roosevelt
is a man of culture and refinement, a descendant of the aristocratic
“knickerbocker” families, one of the famous New York “four hundred[,]”
the creme de la creme of American society. He is at the same time
a man of great wealth. He has been ranchman and hunter. When the
Cuban war broke out he formed his “Rough Riders” of the cowboys
and sheriffs he knew out West, and the young Harvard and Yale men
he knew in New York society, and the extremes met and fused most
happily. Let us hope that will be a good augury of his Presidency.
Mr. Roosevelt, though he had resigned Ministerial office to form
his regiment, would not take chief command. That he secured for
Colonel Wood, a medical and military officer, now the General Wood
who transformed Santiago, and it was only when his Colonel was promoted
to a larger charge that the Major “moved up.” The hold on the popular
fancy secured by the Rough Riders made their founder Governor of
New York State, and in that [?] he waged relentless war on Tammany
cor[?] and “machine” politics; and Tamma[ny?] [?] said, was instrumental
in “shelving [?] [720][721] vigorous
and capable opponent in the usually ornamental and not specially
effective office of the Vice-Presidency. And now the bullet of a
degenerate Pole has made him ruler of the nation, with greater power
than any ruler of Europe, save perhaps him of Russia. Even the Czar
is dominated by his Council of State while an American President
dominates his Council. And Tammany has written over its portals,
“God’s way—His will be done.”
|