Publication information |
Source: Lucifer, the Light-Bearer Source type: magazine Document type: editorial column Document title: “Notes from the Picket Line” Author(s): Harman, Moses Date of publication: 5 October 1901 Volume number: 5 Issue number: 38 Series: third series Pagination: 310-11 (excerpt below includes only page 310) |
Citation |
Harman, Moses. “Notes from the Picket Line.” Lucifer, the Light-Bearer 5 Oct. 1901 v5n38 (3rd series): pp. 310-11. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
H. S. Canfield; McKinley assassination (news coverage); Leon Czolgosz (as anarchist); McKinley assassination (personal response); the press (criticism); society (criticism); lawlessness (mob rule: Chicago, IL); McKinley assassination (public response: criticism). |
Named persons |
H. S. Canfield; Leon Czolgosz; Jay Fox; Emma Goldman; Abraham Isaak; William McKinley; John Irving Pearce, Jr.; Charles Weinland. |
Notes |
The identity of Meyers (below) cannot be determined. Newspapers give
his name both as Edward Myers and Edward Meyers.
The date of publication provided by the magazine is October 5, E. M.
301.
Whole No. 885.
Alternate magazine title: Lucifer, the Lightbearer. |
Document |
Notes from the Picket Line [excerpt]
H. S. Canfield writing to the “Chicago American”
from Buffalo, New York, Sept. 23, said the face of the assassin as he sat in
the dock awaiting his trial and sentence, gave the lie to the statement of Isaak
and Fox that Czolgosz impressed them as a “spy,” when seen by them in Chicago.
Canfield thinks Isaak and Fox are deliberate liars, and Czolgosz a much injured
man, by such imputation.
Let us see: If Czolgosz had been a true friend
to Anarchy and Anarchists, why should he try to involve Emma Goldman and her
work in the odium and the peril consequent upon his attempt to kill McKinley?
If he had been, as suspected by Isaak, a traitor and a spy he could not have
served his purpose better than to kill McKinley and say Miss Goldman prompted
him to the act.
The trouble with Canfield is that he belongs to
that class of human parasites knows as “space writers” on the great dailies.
He gets paid by the space, by the number of inches, he can fill with matter
that will tickle the unreasoning masses and bring patronage and money to the
publisher. Like the paid lawyer he uses his brain powers for the fee he is to
get if he wins the case of his client.
Just now Canfield knows that the populace is hungry
for blood; stirred to madness by the inflammatory appeals of the clergy and
the subsidized organs of plutocracy and of imperialistic power—who all know
their privileges would be gone if every man could be his own priest, his own
lawyer and governor, such articles as that of Canfield are eagerly welcomed,
and, inspired by them, such leaders of Chicago society as Pearce, Weinland and
Meyers called loudly for volunteers to hang the imprisoned Isaak, Fox and others,
against whom nothing whatever had been proved.
Again I ask, “who lies?” and if in answer to these
appeals to lynch law the mob were to hang innocent prisoners, who is it that
would be morally responsible for their death?