Publication information |
Source: The Encyclopædia Britannica Source type: book Document type: article Document title: “McKinley, William” Author(s): anonymous Edition: Eleventh edition Volume number: 17 Publisher: Encyclopædia Britannica Company Place of publication: Cambridge, England Year of publication: 1911 Pagination: 256-59 |
Citation |
“McKinley, William.” The Encyclopædia Britannica. 11th ed. Vol. 17. Cambridge: Encyclopædia Britannica, 1911: pp. 256-59. |
Transcription |
full text of article; excerpt of book |
Keywords |
William McKinley (personal history); McKinley presidency; William McKinley (political character). |
Named persons |
Emilio Aguinaldo; Russell Alexander Alger; James G. Blaine; Cornelius N. Bliss; William Jennings Bryan; George Crook; Leon Czolgosz; William R. Day; Lyman J. Gage; James A. Garfield; James A. Gary; Ulysses S. Grant; John W. Griggs; Eugene Hale; Marcus Hanna; Benjamin Harrison; John Hay; Rutherford B. Hayes; Ethan A. Hitchcock; George F. Hoar; Garret A. Hobart [first name misspelled below]; John D. Long; Joseph McKenna; David McKinley (great grandfather); Ida McKinley; James McKinley (grandfather); Nancy Allison McKinley; William McKinley; William McKinley, Sr.; John M. Palmer; Thomas Brackett Reed; Theodore Roosevelt; Elihu Root; Carl Schurz; John Sherman; Charles Emory Smith; Adlai E. Stevenson; William Howard Taft; Henry Moore Teller; Jonathan H. Wallace; James Wilson. |
Notes |
From title page: The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information. |
Document |
McKinley, William
MCKINLEY, WILLIAM
(1843-1901), twenty-fifth president of the United States, was born in Niles,
Trumbull county, Ohio, on the 29th of January 1843. His ancestors on the paternal
side were Scotch-Irish who lived at Dervock, Co. Antrim, and spelled the family
name “McKinlay.” His great-great-grandfather settled in York county, Pennsylvania,
about 1743, and from Chester county, Pennsylvania, his great-grandfather, David
McKinley, who served as a private during the War of Independence, moved to Ohio
in 1814. David’s son James had gone in 1809 to Columbiana county, Ohio. His
son William McKinley (b. 1807), like his father an iron manufacturer, was married
in 1829 to Nancy Campbell Allison, and to them were born nine children, of whom
William, the president, was the seventh. In 1852 the family removed to Poland,
Mahoning county, where the younger William was placed at school. At seventeen
he entered the junior class of Allegheny College, at Meadville, Pennsylvania;
but he studied beyond his strength, and returned to Poland, where for a time
he taught in a neighbouring country school. When the Civil War broke out in
1861 he promptly enlisted as a private in the 23rd Ohio Volunteer Infantry.
He saw service in West Virginia, at South Mountain, where this regiment lost
heavily, and at Antietam, where he brought up hot coffee and provisions to the
fighting line; for this he was promoted second lieutenant on the 24th of September
1862. McKinley was promoted first lieutenant in February 1864, and for his services
at Winchester was promoted captain on the 25th of July 1864. He was on the staff
of General George Crook at the battles of Opequan, Fisher’s Hill, and Cedar
Creek in the Shenandoah valley, and on the 14th of March 1865 was brevetted
major of volunteers for gallant and meritorious services. He also served on
the staff of General Rutherford B. Hayes, who spoke highly of his soldierly
qualities. He was mustered out with his regiment on the 26th of July 1865. Four
years of army life had changed him from a pale and sickly lad into a man of
superb figure and health.
After the war McKinley returned to Poland, and bent
all his energy upon the study of law. He completed his preparatory reading at
the Albany (N.Y.) law school, and was admitted to the bar at Warren, Ohio, in
March 1867. On the advice of an elder sister, who had been for several years
a teacher in Canton, Stark county, Ohio, be began his law practice in that place,
which was to be his permanent home. He identified himself immediately with the
Republican party, campaigned in the Democratic county of Stark in favour of
negro suffrage in 1867, and took part in the campaign work on behalf of Grant’s
presidential candidature in 1868. In the following year he was elected prosecuting
attorney on the Republican ticket; in 1871 he failed of re-election by 45 votes,
and again devoted himself to his profession, while not relaxing his interest
in politics.
In 1875 be first became known as an able campaign speaker
by his speeches favouring the resumption of specie payments, and in behalf of
Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate for governor of Ohio. In 1876
he was elected by a majority of 3304 to the national House of Representatives.
Conditions both in Ohio and in Congress had placed him, and were to keep him
for twenty years, in an attitude of aggressive and uncompromising partisanship.
His Congressional district was naturally Democratic, and its boundaries were
changed two or three times by Democratic legislatures for the purpose of so
grouping Democratic strongholds as to cause his defeat. But he overcame what
had threatened to be adverse majorities on all occasions from 1876 to 1890,
with the single exception of 1882, when, although he received a certificate
of election showing that he had been re-elected by a majority of 8, and although
he served nearly through the long session of 1883-1884, his seat was contested
and taken (May 28, 1884) by his Democratic opponent, Jonathan H. Wallace. McKinley
reflected the strong sentiment of his manufacturing constituency in behalf of
a high protective tariff, and he soon became known in Congress (where he particularly
attracted the attention of James G. Blaine) as one of the most diligent students
of industrial policy and question affecting national taxation. In 1878 he took
part in the debates over the Wood Tariff Bill, proposing lower import duties;
and in the same year he voted for the Bland-Allison Silver Bill. In December
1880 he was appointed a member of the Ways and Means committee, succeeding General
James A. Garfield, who had been elected president in the preceding month, and
to whose friendship, as to that of Rutherford B. Hayes, McKinley owed much in
his earlier years in Congress. He was prominent in the debate which resulted
in the defeat of the Democratic Morrison Tariff Bill in 1884, and, as minority
leader of the Ways and Means committee, in the defeat of the Mills Bill for
the revision of the tariff in 1887-1888. In 1889 he became chairman of the Ways
and Means committee and Republican leader in the House of Representatives, after
having been defeated by Thomas B. Reed on the third ballot in the Republican
caucus for speaker of the House. On the 16th of April 1890 he introduced from
the Ways and Means committee the tariff measure known commonly as the McKinley
Bill, which passed the House on the 21st of May, passed the Senate (in an amended
form, with a reciprocity clause, which McKinley had not been able to get through
the House) on the 10th of September, was passed as amended, by the House, and
was approved by the president on the 1st of October 1890. The McKinley Bill
reduced revenues by its high and in many cases almost prohibitive duties; it
[256][257] put sugar on the free list with a discriminating
duty of 1/10th
of one cent a pound on sugar imported from countries giving a bounty for sugar
exported, and it gave bounties to American sugar growers; it attempted to protect
many “infant” industries such as the manufacture of tin-plate; under its provision
for reciprocal trade agreements (a favourite project of James G. Blaine, who
opposed many of the “protective” features of the Bill) reciprocity treaties
were made with Germany, France, Italy, and Belgium, which secured a market in
those countries for American pork. Abroad, where the Bill made McKinley’s name
known everywhere, there was bitter opposition to it and reprisals were threatened
by several European states. In the United States the McKinley Tariff Bill was
one of the main causes of the Democratic victory in the Congressional elections
of 1890, in which McKinley himself was defeated by an extraordinary Democratic
gerrymander of his Congressional district. In November 1891 he was elected governor
of Ohio with a plurality of more than 21,000 votes in a total of 795,000 votes
cast. He was governor of Ohio in 1892-1895, being re-elected in 1893. His administration
was marked by no important events, except that he had on several occasions in
his second term to call out the militia of the state to preserve order; but
it may be considered important because of the training it gave him in executive
as distinguished from legislative work.
McKinley had been prominent in national politics even
before the passage of the tariff measure bearing his name. In 1888 in the National
Republican Convention in Chicago he was chairman of the committee on resolutions
(i.e. the platform committee) and was leader of the delegation
from Ohio, which had been instructed for John Sherman; after James G. Blaine
withdrew his name there was a movement, begun by Republican congressmen, to
nominate McKinley, who received 16 votes on the seventh ballot, but passionately
refused to be a candidate, considering that his acquiescence would be a breach
of faith toward Sherman. In 1892 McKinley was the permanent president of the
National Republican Convention which met in Minneapolis and which renominated
Benjamin Harrison on the first ballot, on which James G. Blaine received 182
5/6 votes, and McKinley,
in spite of his efforts to the contrary, received 182 votes. In 1894 he made
an extended campaign tour before the Congressional elections, and spoke even
in the South. In 1896 he seemed for many reasons the most “available” candidate
of his party for the presidency: he had no personal enemies in the party; he
had carried the crucial state of Ohio by a large majority in 1893; his attitude
on the coinage question had never been so pronounced as to make him unpopular
either with the radical silver wing or with the conservative “gold-standard”
members of the party. The campaign for his nomination was conducted with the
greatest adroitness by his friend, Marcus A. Hanna, and in the National Republican
Convention held in St Louis in June he was nominated for the presidency on the
first ballot by 661 ½ out of a total of 906 votes. The convention adopted
a tariff plank drafted by McKinley, and, of far greater immediate importance,
a plank, which declared that the Republican party was “opposed to the free coinage
of silver, except by international agreement with the leading commercial nations
of the world, which we pledge ourselves to promote, and until such agreement
can be obtained the existing gold standard must be preserved.” This “gold standard”
plank drove out of the Republican party the Silver Republicans of the West,
headed by Senator Henry M. Teller of Colorado. The Republican convention nominated
for the vice-presidency Garrett A. Hobart of New Jersey. The National Democratic
Convention declared for the immediate opening of the mints to the free and unlimited
coinage of silver at the ratio with gold of 16 to 1; and it nominated for the
presidency William Jennings Bryan of Nebraska, who also received the nomination
of the People’s party and of the National Silver party. There was a secession
from the Democratic party of conservatives who called themselves the National
Democratic party, who were commonly called Gold Democrats, and who nominated
John M. Palmer (1817-1900) of Illinois for president. In this re-alignment of
parties McKinley, who had expected to make the campaign on the issue of a high
protective tariff, was diverted to the defence of the gold standard as the main
issue. While his opponent travelled throughout the country making speeches,
McKinley remained in Canton, where he was visited by and addressed many Republican
delegations. The campaign was enthusiastic: the Republican candidate was called
the “advance agent of prosperity”; “Bill McKinley and the McKinley Bill” became
a campaign cry; the panic of 1893 was charged to the repeal of the McKinley
tariff measure; and “business men” throughout the states were enlisted in the
cause of “sound money” to support McKinley, who was elected in November by a
popular vote of 7,106,779 to 6,502,925 for Bryan, and by an electoral vote of
271 to 176.
McKinley was inaugurated president of the United States
on the 4th of March 1897. The members of his cabinet were: secretary of state,
John Sherman (whose appointment created a vacancy in the Senate to which Marcus
A. Hanna was elected), who was succeeded in April 1898 by William R. Day, who
in turn was followed in September 1898 by John Hay; secretary of the treasury,
Lyman J. Gage, a Gold Democrat; secretary of war, Russell A. Alger, who was
succeeded in 1899 by Elihu Root; secretary of the navy, John D. Long; attorney-general,
Joseph McKenna, succeeded in January 1898 by John William Griggs; postmaster-general,
James A. Gary, succeeded in April 1898 by Charles Emory Smith; secretary of
the interior, Cornelius N. Bliss, succeeded in February 1899 by Ethan Allen
Hitchcock; and secretary of agriculture, James Wilson. (For the political history
of McKinley’s administration see UNITED STATES:
History). Immediately after his inauguration the president summoned Congress
to assemble in an extra session on the 15th of March. The Democratic tariff
in 1893 had been enacted as part of the general revenue measure, which included
an income-tax. The income-tax having been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court, the measure had failed to produce a sufficient revenue, and it had been
necessary to increase the public debt. McKinley’s message to the new Congress
dwelt upon the necessity of an immediate revision of the tariff and revenue
system of the country, and the so-called Dingley Tariff Bill was accordingly
passed through both houses, and was approved by the president on the 24th of
July.
The regular session of Congress which opened in December
was occupied chiefly with the situation in Cuba. President McKinley showed himself
singularly patient and self-controlled in the midst of the popular excitement
against Spain and the clamour for intervention by the United States in behalf
of the Cubans; but finally, on the 23rd of March, he presented an ultimatum
to the Spanish government, and on the 25th of April, on his recommendation,
Congress declared war upon Spain. During the war itself he devoted himself with
great energy to the mastery of military details; but there was bitter criticism
of the war department resulting in the resignation of the secretary of war,
Russell A. Alger (q.v.). The signing of a peace protocol on the
12th of August was followed by the signature at Paris on the 10th of December
of articles of peace between the United States and Spain. After a long discussion
the peace treaty was ratified by the United States Senate on the 6th of February
1899; and in accordance with its terms Porto Rico, the Philippine Archipelago,
and Guam were transferred by Spain to the United States, and Cuba came under
American jurisdiction pending the establishment there of an independent government.
Two days before the ratification of the peace treaty, a conflict took place
between armed Filipinos under the leadership of Emilio Aguinaldo and the American
forces that were in possession of Manila. The six months that had elapsed between
the signing of the peace protocol and the ratification of the treaty had constituted
a virtual interregnum, Spain’s authority having been practically destroyed in
the Philippines and that of the United States [257][258]
not having begun. In this period a formidable native Filipino army had been
organized and a provisional government created. The warfare waged by these Filipinos
against the United States, while having for the most part a desultory and guerilla
character, was of a very protracted and troublesome nature. Sovereignty over
the Filipinos having been accepted by virtue of the ratification of the Paris
treaty, President McKinley was not at liberty to do otherwise than assert the
authority of the United States and use every endeavour to suppress the insurrection.
But there was bitter protest against this “imperialism,” both within the party
by such men as Senators George F. Hoar and Eugene Hale, and Thomas B. Reed and
Carl Schurz, and, often for purely political reasons, from the leaders of the
Democratic party. In the foreign relations of the United States, as directed
by President McKinley, the most significant change was the cordial understanding
established with the British government, to which much was contributed by his
secretary of state, John Hay, appointed to that portfolio when he was ambassador
to the court of St James, and which was due to some extent to the friendliness
of the British press and even more markedly of the British navy in the Pacific
during the Spanish War. Other important foreign events during McKinley’s administration
were: the annexation of the Hawaiian Islands (see HAWAII)
in August 1898, and the formation of the Territory of Hawaii in April 1900;
the cessation in 1899 of the tripartite (German, British, and French) government
of the Samoan Islands, and the annexation by the United States of those of the
islands east of 171º, including the harbour of Pago-Pago; the participation
of American troops in the march of the allies on Pekin in August 1900, and the
part played by McKinley’s secretary of state, John Hay, in securing a guarantee
of the integrity of the Chinese empire. In 1900 McKinley was unanimously renominated
by the National Republican Convention which met in Philadelphia on the 19th
of June, and which nominated Theodore Roosevelt, governor of New York, for the
vice-presidency. The Republican convention demanded the maintenance of the gold
standard, and pointed to the fulfilment of some of the most important of the
pledges given by the Republican party four years earlier. The intervening period
had been one of very exceptional prosperity in the United States, foreign commerce
having reached an unprecedented volume, and agriculture and manufactures having
made greater advancement than in any previous period of the country’s history.
The tendency towards the concentration of capital in great industrial corporations
had been active to an extent previously undreamt of, with incidental consequences
that had aroused much apprehension; and the Democrats accused President McKinley
and the Republican party of having fostered the “trusts.” But the campaign against
McKinley and the Republican party was not only “anti-trust” but “anti-imperialistic.”
William Jennings Bryan, renominated by the Democratic party in July (and in
May by the Fusion People’s party) on a free silver platform, declared that imperialism
was the “paramount issue” and made a second vigorous campaign; and the opposition
to McKinley’s re-election, whether based on opposition to his economic or to
his foreign policy, was not entirely outside of his own party. As the result
of the polling in November, 292 Republican presidential electors were chosen,
and 155 Democratic electors, elected in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and
the Southern states, represented the final strength of the Bryan and Stevenson
ticket. The Republican popular vote was 7,207,923, and the Democratic 6,358,133.
Since 1872 no president had been re-elected for a second consecutive term.
In the term of Congress immediately following the presidential
election it was found possible to reduce materially the war taxes which had
been levied on the outbreak of the Spanish-American War. Arrangements were perfected
for the termination of the American military occupation of Cuba and the inauguration
of a Cuban Republic as a virtual protectorate of the United States, the American
government having arranged with the Cuban constitutional convention for the
retention of certain naval stations on the Cuban coast. In the Philippines advanced
steps had been taken in the substitution of civil government for military occupation,
and a governor-general, Judge William H. Taft, had been appointed and sent to
Manila. Prosperity at home was great, and foreign relations were free from complications.
The problems which had devolved upon McKinley’s administration had been far
advanced towards final settlement. He retained without change the cabinet of
his first administration. After an arduous and anxious term, the president had
reached a period that promised to give him comparative repose and freedom from
care. He had secured, through the co-operation of Congress, the permanent reorganization
of the army and a very considerable development of the navy. In these circumstances,
President McKinley, accompanied by the greater part of his cabinet, set forth
in the early summer on a tour to visit the Pacific coast, where he was to witness
the launching of the battleship “Ohio” at San Francisco. The route chosen was
through the Southern states, where many stops were made, and where the president
delivered brief addresses. The heartiness of the welcome accorded him seemed
to mark the disappearance of the last vestige of sectional feeling that had
survived the Civil War, in which McKinley had participated as a young man. After
his return he spent a month in a visit at his old home in Canton, Ohio, and
at the end of this visit, by previous arrangement, he visited the city of Buffalo,
New York, in order to attend the Pan-American exposition and deliver a public
address. This address (Sept. 5, 1901) was a public utterance designed by McKinley
to affect American opinion and public policy, and apparently to show that he
had modified his views upon the tariff. It declared that henceforth the progress
of the nations must be through harmony and co-operation, in view of the fast-changing
conditions of communication and trade, and it maintained that the time had come
for wide-reaching modifications in the tariff policy of the United States, the
method preferred by McKinley being that of commercial reciprocity arrangements
with various nations. On the following day, the 6th of September 1901, a great
reception was held for President McKinley in one of the public buildings of
the exposition, all sorts and conditions of men being welcome. Advantage of
this opportunity was taken by a young man of Polish parentage, by name Leon
Czolgosz, to shoot at the president with a revolver at close range. One of the
two bullets fired penetrated the abdomen. After the world had been assured that
the patient was doing well and would recover, he collapsed and died on the 14th.
The assassin, who, it was for a time supposed, had been inflamed by the editorials
and cartoons of the demagogic opposition press, but who professed to hold the
views of that branch of anarchists who believe in the assassination of rulers
and persons exercising political authority, was promptly seized, and was convicted
and executed in October 1901. McKinley’s conduct and utterances in his last
days revealed a loftiness of personal character that everywhere elicited admiration
and praise. Immediately after his death Vice-President Roosevelt took the oath
of office, announcing that it would be his purpose to continue McKinley’s policy,
while also retaining the cabinet and the principal officers of the government.
McKinley’s funeral took place at Canton, Ohio, on the 19th of September, the
occasion being remarkable for the public manifestations of mourning, not only
in the United States, but in Great Britain and other countries; in Canton a
memorial tomb has been erected.
Though he had not the personal magnetism of James G.
Blaine, whom he succeeded as a leader of the Republican party and whose views
of reciprocity he formally adopted in his last public address, McKinley had
great personal suavity and dignity, and was thoroughly well liked by his party
colleagues. As a politician he was always more the people’s representative than
their leader, and that he “kept his ear to the ground” was the source of much
of his power and at the same time was his greatest weakness: his address at
Buffalo the day before his assassination seems to voice his appreciation of
the change [258][259] in popular sentiment regarding
the tariff laws of the United States and is the more remarkable as coming from
the foremost champion for years of a form of tariff legislation devised to stifle
international competition. His apparently inconsistent record on the coinage
question becomes consistent if considered in the same way, as the expression
of the gradually changing views of his constituency. And it may not be fanciful
to suggest that the obvious growth of McKinley in breadth and power during his
term as president was due to his being the representative of a larger constituency,
less local and less narrow-minded. He was an able but far from brilliant campaign
speaker. His greatest administrative gift was a fine intuition in choosing men
to serve him. McKinley’s private life was irreproachable; and very fine was
his devotion to his wife, Ida. Saxton (d. 1907), whom he had married in Canton
in 1871, who was throughout his political career a confirmed invalid. He was
from his early manhood a prominent member of the Methodist Episcopal Church.